The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-50310•United States of America v. Gregory Macdonald Berry
12-50310Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDec 9, 2013
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
GREGORY MACDONALD BERRY,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 12-50310
D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00831-DSF
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 19, 2013**
Before: CANBY, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Gregory MacDonald Berry appeals pro se from the district court’s order
denying his motion for return of property. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291, and we affirm.
FILED
DEC 09 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
-- 1 of 2 --
In 2010, the government offered to release Berry’s property to someone
designated by Berry or to package the items and ship them at Berry’s expense.
Berry has cited no authority to support his claim that the government must return
the property to him at the government’s expense.
AFFIRMED.
12-50310 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.