The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-71601•Marcos Rojas-Urizar v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
12-71601Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDec 2, 2013
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARCOS ROJAS-URIZAR,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 12-71601
Agency No. A095-772-364
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
November 19, 2013**
Before: CANBY, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Marcos Rojas-Urizar, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of
the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252.
We review mixed questions of law and fact de novo and factual determinations
FILED
DEC 02 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
-- 1 of 2 --
underlying this inquiry are reviewed for clear error. United States v. Diaz-Juarez,
299 F.3d 1138, 1140 (9th Cir. 2002). We deny the petition for review.
The agency did not clearly err in finding that the officer did not stop Rojas-
Urizar solely because of his race and that legitimate, non-racial factors motivated
the officer’s stop. See United States v. Manzo-Jurado, 457 F.3d 928, 936 (9th Cir.
2006); Diaz-Juarez, 299 F.3d at 1142; cf. Gonzalez-Rivera v. INS, 22 F.3d 1441
(9th Cir. 1994).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
12-71601 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.