Miguel Carrillo v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MIGUEL CARRILLO,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 12-71179
Agency No. A070-915-954
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of
The Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted September 11, 2013 **
San Francisco, California
Before: ALARCÓN and BERZON, Circuit Judges; and ZOUHARY, District
Judge.***
FILED
OCT 07 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
*** The Honorable Jack Zouhary, United States District Judge for the
Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.

-- 1 of 2 --

The only claim in his Petition is that Carrillo’s conviction of an aggravated
felony was invalid because of ineffective assistance of counsel. That contention “is
no longer supportable,” because Chaidez v. United States, __ U.S. ___, 133 S. Ct.
1103 (2013), held Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2009), non-retroactive. Pet’r’s
Suppl. Br. at 5.
DENIED.
2

-- 2 of 2 --