United States of America v. Noe Reza-Guerrero, a.k.a. Noe Reza Guerrero, a.k.a. Noe Guerrero-Reza

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, United States District Judge for the*
*
Northern District of Iowa, sitting by designation.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
NOE REZA-GUERRERO, a.k.a. Noe
Reza Guerrero, a.k.a. Noe Guerrero-Reza,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 12-10540
D.C. No. 4:11-cr-01767-DCB
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Mark W. Bennett, District Judge, Presiding**
Submitted September 24, 2013***
Before: RAWLINSON, N.R. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
Noe Reza-Guerrero appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 41-month sentence for reentry after
FILED
OCT 03 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

12-10540 2
deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), Reza-Guerrero’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no
grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have
provided Reza-Guerrero the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro
se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --