Armando Aguilar-Zuniga, a.k.a. Armando Aguilar, a.k.a. Pedro Gonzalez- Martinez v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ARMANDO AGUILAR-ZUNIGA, a.k.a.
Armando Aguilar, a.k.a. Pedro Gonzalez-
Martinez,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 12-71565
Agency No. A095-795-951
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted September 24, 2013**
Before: RAWLINSON, N.R. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
Armando Aguilar-Zuniga, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s denial of his application for cancellation of removal. Our
FILED
OCT 01 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

12-71565 2
jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo claims of due
process violations. Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.
2005). We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that
Aguilar-Zuniga failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his
qualifying relatives. See id.
We reject Aguilar-Zuniga’s contention that the agency’s decision violated
his children’s due process rights. See Urbano de Malaluan v. INS, 577 F.2d 589,
594 (9th Cir. 1978); see also Morales-Izquierdo v. DHS, 600 F.3d 1076, 1091 (9th
Cir. 2010) (holding that “lawfully denying [the alien parent immigration relief]
does not violate any of his or his family’s substantive rights protected by the Due
Process Clause”).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

-- 2 of 2 --