Qiu Jin Li, a.k.a. Quijin Li, a.k.a. Qujing Li v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We deny Li’s request for
oral argument.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
QIU JIN LI, a.k.a. Quijin Li, a.k.a. Qujing
Li
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 10-72587
Agency No. A095-716-364
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted September 24, 2013**
Before: RAWLINSON, N.R. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
Qiu Jin Li, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of
Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to remand and dismissing
her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for
FILED
SEP 26 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

10-72587 2
asylum. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo due
process contentions, Yan Liu v. Holder, 640 F.3d 918, 930 (9th Cir. 2011), and we
dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.
Li’s only contention is that the IJ violated her due process rights by
compelling her to reveal privileged attorney-client communications. We lack
jurisdiction to consider this contention because Li did not raise it to the BIA. See
Tall v. Mukasey, 517 F.3d 1115, 1120 (9th Cir. 2008).
Li does not otherwise challenge the BIA’s dispositive adverse credibility
findings. Accordingly, we deny the petition.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

-- 2 of 2 --