The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-30100•United States of America v. RICKY ALAN REESE, AKA Ricky A. Reese
11-30100Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAug 26, 2013
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RICKY ALAN REESE, AKA Ricky A.
Reese,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 11-30100
D.C. No. 3:10-cr-00010-HRH-1
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Alaska
H. Russel Holland, Senior District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted August 15, 2013
Anchorage, Alaska
Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, BERZON and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
Reese admits he didn’t see the allegedly defective notice before trial, and
doesn’t allege he would have accepted a plea agreement but for the erroneous
sentencing information. He therefore hasn’t demonstrated that the alleged error
FILED
AUG 26 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
-- 1 of 2 --
page 2
“affected substantial rights.” United States v. Gonzalez-Aparicio, 663 F.3d 419,
428 (9th Cir. 2011).
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.