United States of America v. Robin Bolton

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ROBIN BOLTON,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 12-30369
D.C. No. 1:11-cr-00022-JDS
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Montana
Jack D. Shanstrom, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 24, 2013**
Before: ALARCÓN, CLIFTON, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Robin Bolton appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the
18-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Bolton contends that the district court erred by failing to (i) explain the
FILED
AUG 01 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

12-30369 2
sentence sufficiently to permit meaningful appellate review and (ii) discuss the
applicable Sentencing Guidelines range and applicable 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)
sentencing factors. We review for plain error, see United States v. Valencia-
Barragan, 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th Cir. 2010), and find none. The court
considered the advisory Guidelines and section 3553(a) sentencing factors, and
adequately explained the sentence.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --