Karan L. Zopatti v. RANCHO DORADO HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION and THE PRESCOTT COMPANIES

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KARAN L. ZOPATTI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RANCHO DORADO HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION and THE PRESCOTT
COMPANIES,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 11-56447
D.C. No. 3:10-cv-01091-DMS-
WVG
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Southern District of California
Dana M. Sabraw, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted June 3, 2013
Pasadena, California
Before: TROTT and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and STEIN, District
Judge.**
Karan Zopatti appeals two orders of the district court: one excluding the
testimony of her proffered experts and another granting summary judgment in
favor of defendants Rancho Dorado Homeowners Association and The Prescott
FILED
JUL 18 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The Honorable Sidney H. Stein, District Judge for the U.S. District
Court for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

-- 1 of 2 --

Companies. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. This Court
reviews a district court’s decision to exclude expert testimony for abuse of
discretion and a decision granting summary judgment de novo. See Primiano v.
Cook, 598 F.3d 558, 563 (9th Cir. 2010). We have considered all of plaintiff’s
arguments in favor of reversal and find them unavailing.1 The district court did not
abuse its discretion in excluding plaintiff’s experts and there is no genuine issue of
material fact that would preclude summary judgment on any of plaintiff’s
numerous claims for relief.
AFFIRMED.
1 Because the parties’ briefs and excerpts of record were filed under
seal, we decline to discuss them in detail.
2

-- 2 of 2 --