Wenxin Zhang v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
WENXIN ZHANG,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 10-72954
Agency No. A099-901-803
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted June 18, 2013**
Before: TALLMAN, M. SMITH, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Wenxin Zhang, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the
Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration
judge’s decision denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings held in
absentia. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of
FILED
JUN 20 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

10-72954 2
discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Garcia v. INS, 222 F.3d 1208, 1209
(9th Cir. 2000), and we deny the petition for review.
The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Zhang’s motion to reopen
where the notice provided to Zhang of his next hearing date was sufficient. See id.
at 1209 (notice to counsel of record constitutes notice to alien).
The October 22, 2010, motion to intervene filed by the Robin Hood
International Human Rights Legal Defense Fund is denied.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --