Karen Y. Kirby v. EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr. and CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KAREN Y. KIRBY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr. and
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 13-15281
D.C. No. 2:13-cv-00021-LKK-
JFM
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of California
Lawrence K. Karlton, Senior District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 17, 2013**
Before: HAWKINS, GOULD and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
FILED
JUN 19 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

13-15281 2
Plaintiff Karen Kirby appeals pro se the district court’s denial of her request
for preliminary injunctive relief. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.
Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying
preliminary injunctive relief, and we conclude the district court did not abuse its
discretion. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 555 U.S. 7, 24 (2008)
(listing factors for district court to consider); Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press
Int’l, 686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir. 1982) (explaining limited scope of review).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --