United States of America v. Esteban Parra-Reyes

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ESTEBAN PARRA-REYES,
Defendant - Appellant.
Nos. 12-10139
12-10144
D.C. Nos. 2:03-cr-00151-PGR
2:11-cr-02516-PGR
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Paul G. Rosenblatt, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 16, 2013**
Before: CANBY, IKUTA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
In these consolidated appeals, Esteban Parra-Reyes appeals his guilty-plea
conviction and 63-month sentence for reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8
U.S.C. § 1326; and the revocation of supervised release and consecutive seven-
month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
FILED
APR 23 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

12-10139 & 12-10144 2
U.S. 738 (1967), Parra-Reyes’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no
grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have
provided Parra-Reyes the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se
supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Parra-Reyes has waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence, and
his right to challenge the revocation of supervised release and the sentence
imposed upon revocation. Our independent review of the record pursuant to
Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the
validity of the waiver. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir.
2009). We accordingly dismiss the appeals. See id. at 988.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --