Georgy Alexy Gigilashvili v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GEORGY ALEXY GIGILASHVILI,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 12-72904
Agency No. A079-245-069
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted April 16, 2013**
Before: CANBY, IKUTA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
Georgy Alexy Gigilashvili, a native and citizen of Georgia, petitions pro se
for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from
an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum,
withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).
FILED
APR 22 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

12-72904 2
We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence
factual findings, Gonzalez-Hernandez v. Ashcroft, 336 F.3d 995, 998 (9th Cir.
2003), and we deny the petition for review.
Gigilashvili does not challenge the IJ’s dispositive finding that his
application for asylum was untimely.
Gigilashvili fears persecution as a Jehovah’s Witness. Substantial evidence
supports the agency’s finding that, even though Gigilashvili suffered past
persecution, the government rebutted the presumption of a well-founded fear of
future persecution with evidence of a fundamental change in circumstances in
Georgia and evidence that he can reasonably relocate. See id. at 998-1000; 8
C.F.R. § 1208.13(b)(1)(i)(A), (b)(2)(ii). Accordingly, Gigilashvili’s withholding
of removal claim fails.
Finally, substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief
because Gigilashvili failed to establish that it is more likely than not he will be
tortured by or with the acquiescence of the government of Georgia. See Silaya v.
Mukasey, 524 F.3d 1066, 1073 (9th Cir. 2008).
Gigilashvili’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --