Ramon Godinez-Avila v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RAMON GODINEZ-AVILA,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 11-72513
Agency No. A092-655-102
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 19, 2012**
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Ramon Godinez-Avila, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review
of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to
reconsider. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of
discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d
FILED
DEC 21 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

11-72513 2
785, 791 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Godinez-Avila’s motion to
reconsider because the motion failed to identify any error of fact or law in the
BIA’s prior order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal
order. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --