Mirza Lorena Carpio v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MIRZA LORENA CARPIO,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 10-73842
Agency No. A027-551-036
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 19, 2012**
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Mirza Lorena Carpio, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review
of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an
immigration judge’s decision denying her applications for asylum, withholding of
removal, relief under the Convention Against Torture, and special rule cancellation
FILED
DEC 21 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

10-73842 2
of removal under the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act.
Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition for
review.
Carpio’s only argument is that her case should be remanded to the agency
for consideration of her claim, based on Perdomo v. Holder, 611 F.3d 662 (9th Cir.
2010), that she has a well-founded fear of persecution on account of her
membership in the particular social group of Guatemalan women. We lack
jurisdiction to consider this claim because she did not raise it to the agency. See
Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --