Julaine Solomon v. Social Security Administration; Pierce County

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JULAINE SOLOMON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SOCIAL SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION; PIERCE COUNTY,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 11-35396
D.C. No. 3:11-cv-05114-RBL
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Washington
Ronald B. Leighton, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 10, 2012**
Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Julaine Solomon appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying her
motion to reconsider in her action against the Social Security Administration and
Pierce County. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an
FILED
SEP 21 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

11-35396 2
abuse of discretion the district court’s order denying a motion to reconsider. Sch.
Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cnty., Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir.
1993). We affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Solomon’s motion
to reconsider because Solomon failed to demonstrate mistake, inadvertence,
surprise, excusable neglect, newly discovered evidence, or any other basis for relief
from judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b); Sch. Dist. No. 1J, 5 F.3d at 1263.
To the extent that they seek relief, Solomon’s pending motions are denied.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --