United States of America v. Maxie A. Moore

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MAXIE A. MOORE,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 11-30336
D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00239-RBL
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Washington
Ronald B. Leighton, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 10, 2012**
Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Maxie A. Moore appeals from the district court’s amended judgment issued
following this court’s remand in United States v. Moore, 449 Fed. Appx. 677 (9th
Cir. 2011) (unpublished). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
FILED
SEP 19 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

11-30336 2
Moore’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with
a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Moore filed a pro se supplemental
brief. No answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
Moore’s motion for appointment of new counsel, received on April 20,
2012, is DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --