United States of America v. Perfecto Flores-Rosas, a.k.a. Javier Dominguez-Flores

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
PERFECTO FLORES-ROSAS, a.k.a.
Javier Dominguez-Flores,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 11-10226
D.C. No. 2:08-cr-00799-JAT
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
James A. Teilborg, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 10, 2012**
Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Perfecto Flores-Rosas appeals from the revocation of his supervised release
and the 10-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Flores-Rosas’s counsel has filed a brief stating
FILED
SEP 19 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

11-10226 2
there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of
record. We have provided Flores-Rosas the opportunity to file a pro se
supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been
filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --