Stenly Laloan Rantung v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STENLY LALOAN RANTUNG,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 09-73832
Agency No. A078-020-447
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted September 10, 2012**
Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Stenly Laloan Rantung, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order denying his motion to reopen.
We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition for review.
FILED
SEP 18 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

09-73832 2
Rantung’s only argument is that his case should be remanded for the agency
to assess his withholding of removal claim under the disfavored group analysis.
We reject Rantung’s argument in light of our prior decision, Rantung v. Mukasey,
No. 05-75377, 2008 WL 4155280 (9th Cir. Sept. 10, 2008), in which this court
applied the disfavored group analysis to Rantung’s withholding of removal claim
and rejected his claim. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --