DEBORA SORENSEN and TRACY SORENSEN v. Credit International Corporation

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DEBORA SORENSEN and TRACY
SORENSEN,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
CREDIT INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 11-35329
D.C. No. 3:10-cv-05408-RBL
ORDER*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Washington
Ronald B. Leighton, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 6, 2012 **
Seattle, Washington
Before: NOONAN, GRABER, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Debora and Tracy Sorensen appeal the district court’s award of attorneys’
fees in the amount of $250 to appellee Credit International Corporation on the
FILED
AUG 13 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 3 --

2
basis that the district court did not allow sufficient time for appellants to file a
response to appellee’s motion for attorneys’ fees.
Credit International Corporation filed its motion for attorneys’ fees on
Monday, March 14, 2011. Two days later, on March 16, the district court granted
the motion in part and denied it in part. However, according to Local Rule 7(d)(3),
the motion should have been noted for hearing no sooner than April 1, the third
Friday after filing and service of the motion, and the Sorensens should have been
given until Monday, March 28–the last Monday before the notice date–to file their
opposition papers. Local Rules W.D. Wash. 7(d)(3).
The district court made the award of attorneys’ fees without making a
finding that the Sorensens brought their Fair Debt Collection Practices Act action
in bad faith and for the purpose of harassment, as required by statute. See 15
U.S.C. § 1692k(a)(3); Allers-Petrus v. Columbia Recovery Group, LLC, No. C08-
5533 (W.D. Wash. April 29, 2009).
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is REVERSED and the case
is REMANDED. On remand, the district court shall 1) allow the parties adequate
time to fully brief appellee’s motion for attorneys’ fees before issuing its decision,
and 2) make a finding regarding whether the Sorensens brought this action in bad
faith and for the purpose of harassment.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal.
REVERSED and REMANDED.

-- 3 of 3 --