United States of America v. Jamie Teichman

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JAMIE TEICHMAN,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 11-10255
D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00313-KJD
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Nevada
Kent J. Dawson, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 21, 2012**
Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Jamie Teichman appeals from his conviction and from the 33-month
sentence imposed following his guilty plea to conspiracy to commit mail, wire, and
bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349. We have jurisdiction under 28
FILED
APR 18 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

11-10255 2
U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm in part and dismiss in part.
Teichman contends that the government breached the plea agreement by
acting in bad faith when it opposed his motion to continue sentencing and made
false representations at the sentencing hearing. This contention is belied by the
record.
Teichman also contends the district court abused its discretion by denying
his motion to continue sentencing. The valid and enforceable appeal waiver set
forth in the plea agreement precludes our review of this issue. See United States v.
Bibler, 495 F.3d 621, 623-24 (9th Cir. 2007).
AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part.

-- 2 of 2 --