Full text
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NORBERTO FARAON, AKA Norberto
Fraon, AKA Norberto Praon,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-71692
Agency No. A042-575-492
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted March 8, 2012**
Pasadena, California
Before: FARRIS, CLIFTON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
Because Faraon did not argue before the BIA that he attempted to withdraw
or should have been allowed to withdraw his concession to the charge of
FILED
MAR 13 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS
-- 1 of 2 --
2
removability, we have no jurisdiction to consider his petition. See Barron v.
Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004).
DISMISSED.
-- 2 of 2 --
