Maria Magdalena Funes Obrego v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARIA MAGDALENA FUNES
OBREGO,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 09-73381
Agency No. A095-719-492
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 21, 2012**
Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Maria Magdalena Funes Obrego, a native and citizen of El Salvador,
petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying
her motion to reconsider. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review
FILED
MAR 02 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

09-73381 2
for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider, Mohammed v.
Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791 (9th Cir. 2005), and we deny the petition for review.
The BIA acted within its discretion in denying Obrego’s motion to
reconsider because the motion failed to identify any error of fact or law in the
BIA’s prior order. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --