United States of America v. Juan Aguilar-Perez

11-30172Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFeb 29, 2012

Full text

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JUAN AGUILAR-PEREZ,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 11-30172
D.C. No. 2:10-cr-02018-EFS-1
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Washington
Edward F. Shea, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 21, 2012**
Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Juan Aguilar-Perez appeals from the 77–month sentence imposed following
his guilty-plea conviction for being in the United States after deportation, in
violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we
affirm.
FILED
FEB 29 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 11-30172
Aguilar-Perez contends that his sentence was substantively unreasonable.
His sentence at the low end of the Guidelines range was not substantively
unreasonable in light of the totality of the circumstances and the 18 U.S.C.
§ 3553(a) sentencing factors. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.