Sang Koo Yi v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SANG KOO YI,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 10-71007
Agency No. A096-691-955
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 21, 2012**
Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Sang Koo Yi, a native and citizen of Korea, petitions for review of
a Board of Immigration Appeals order dismissing his appeal from an immigration
judge’s denial of his application for cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is
governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition for review.
FILED
FEB 29 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 10-71007
We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that
Yi failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his U.S. citizen
mother. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B); Mendez-Castro v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 975, 979
(9th Cir. 2009).
Yi’s contention that the agency failed to properly consider and weigh all
evidence of hardship does not raise a colorable due process claim. Martinez-Rosas
v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir. 2005).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --