The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-10449•United States of America v. Tiffany Angelo
10-10449Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFeb 24, 2012
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TIFFANY ANGELO,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 10-10449
D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00334-JCM-
GWF
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Nevada
James C. Mahan, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 21, 2012**
Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
The United States appeals the district court’s order reducing the amount of a
criminal forfeiture money judgment from $400,000 to $100 where Tiffany Angelo
FILED
FEB 24 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS
-- 1 of 2 --
10-10449 2
pled guilty to bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344. We have jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
In light of our holding in United States v. Newman, 659 F.3d 1235 (9th Cir.
2011), we vacate the district court’s entry of an order of criminal forfeiture of
$100, and we remand.
VACATED and REMANDED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.