Adedotun Edun v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ADEDOTUN EDUN,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-72880
Agency No. A038-798-399
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 21, 2012**
Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Adedotun Edun, a native and citizen of Nigeria, petitions for review of the
Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration
judge’s decision denying his motion to reopen deportation proceedings held in
absentia. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of
FILED
FEB 24 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

08-72880 2
discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785,
791 (9th Cir. 2005), and we deny the petition for review.
The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Edun’s motion to reopen
for failure to show “reasonable cause” for his absence from his scheduled hearing.
See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b) (1988).
The agency also did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen
where Edun failed to show prima facie eligibility for relief. See 8 C.F.R.
§ 1003.23(b)(3).
Edun’s remaining contentions are unavailing.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --