The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
11-50012•United States of America v. CESAR DANIEL ALVARADO CANAS, AKA Caesar Alvarado, AKA Cesar Daniel Alvarado, AKA…
11-50012Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFeb 22, 2012
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CESAR DANIEL ALVARADO CANAS,
AKA Caesar Alvarado, AKA Cesar Daniel
Alvarado, AKA Juan Martinez, AKA
Cesar Daniel Novoa, AKA Cesar Daniel
Alvarado Novoa,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 11-50012
D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00329-GHK-1
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
George H. King, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 21, 2012 **
Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
FILED
FEB 22 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS
-- 1 of 2 --
Cesar Daniel Alvarado Canas appeals his conviction by guilty plea and
sentence for illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Canas’ counsel has filed a
brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as
counsel of record. We have provided Canas with the opportunity to file a pro se
supplemental brief. The appellant has filed a pro se supplemental brief, and no
answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district
court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.