The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-50481•United States of America v. Javier Olvera-Yanez, a.k.a. Javier Olivera-Yanez, a.k.a. Nelos Olvera, a.k.a. Javier…
10-50481Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFeb 22, 2012
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. Appellant. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JAVIER OLVERA-YANEZ, a.k.a. Javier
Olivera-Yanez, a.k.a. Nelos Olvera, a.k.a.
Javier Olvera-Yanes, a.k.a. Nelos Vagos,
a.k.a. Javier Yanez-Olvera,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 10-50481
D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00672-PA
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 21, 2012**
Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Attorney Nikoo Berenji appeals the district court’s imposition of sanctions
for appearing late to a hearing. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and
FILED
FEB 22 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS
-- 1 of 2 --
10-50481 2
we vacate the imposition of sanctions and remand.
Berenji contends the district abused its discretion when it imposed a $100
sanction under its inherent powers without a finding of bad faith. We agree that
Berenji’s single tardy appearance does not justify a monetary sanction in this case.
See Mendez v. County of San Bernardino, 540 F.3d 1109, 1130-33 (9th Cir. 2008)
(vacating sanction order imposed under district court’s inherent powers where the
court did not make a bad faith finding before imposing sanctions and the record did
not support such a finding); Zambrano v. City of Tustin, 885 F.2d 1473, 1480 (9th
Cir. 1989) (“[C]onduct amounting to recklessness, gross negligence, repeated—
although unintentional—flouting of court rules, or willful misconduct” is required
before monetary sanctions can be imposed under local rules) (footnotes omitted).
VACATED and REMANDED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.