The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-56079•John Fremont Steel, Iv v. City of San Diego;
10-56079Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJan 18, 2012
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOHN FREMONT STEEL, IV,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CITY OF SAN DIEGO; et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 10-56079
D.C. No. 3:09-cv-01743-MMA-
WVG
MEMORANDUM*
JOHN FREMONT STEEL, IV,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CITY OF SAN DIEGO; et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 10-56193
D.C. No. 3:09-cv-01743-MMA-
WVG
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of California
Michael M. Anello, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted January 11, 2012
Pasadena, California
FILED
JAN 18 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
-- 1 of 2 --
Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, REINHARDT and W. FLETCHER, Circuit
Judges.
Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b), a district court “may direct entry of a final
judgment as to one or more, but fewer than all, claims or parties only if the court
expressly determines that there is no just reason for delay.” Because the district court
did not make such a determination in the judgment before us, that judgment is not
final. See Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981). We therefore dismiss
these appeals for lack of jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
DISMISSED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.