Jesus Rangel-Reynel v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JESUS RANGEL-REYNEL,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-74026
Agency No. A076-637-737
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 19, 2011**
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
Jesus Rangel-Reynel, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252.
We review de novo questions of law, Perez-Mejia v. Holder, __ F.3d __, No. 07-
FILED
JAN 06 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

08-74026 2
70118, 2011 WL 5865888, at *4 (9th Cir. Nov. 23, 2011), and we deny the petition
for review.
Rangel-Reynel’s challenge to his removability under 8 U.S.C.
§ 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii) for having been convicted of an aggravated felony fails
because he is bound by his attorney’s concession of removability during the
pleading stage. See Perez-Mejia, 2011 WL 5865888, at *5-11.
We grant Rangel-Reynel’s motion to accept his late-filed reply brief.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --