United States of America v. Stephon Jones

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
STEPHON JONES,
Defendant - Appellant.
Nos. 11-10113
11-10114
D.C. Nos. 3:03-cr-00284-MHP
3:03-cr-00666-MHP
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California
Marilyn H. Patel, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 19, 2011**
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
In these consolidated appeals, Stephon Jones appeals from the 36-month
sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a felon in
possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), and from the 18-
FILED
DEC 21 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

11-10113 2
month consecutive sentence imposed following revocation of supervised release.
We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Jones contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable given the
nature and circumstances of the offense and his personal history and
characteristics. The consecutive sentences below or within the respective
Guidelines ranges are substantively reasonable in light of the totality of the
circumstances and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. §§ 3553(a) and
3583(e). See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --