John Hoskings v. P.L. VAZQUEZ, Warden

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOHN HOSKINGS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
P.L. VAZQUEZ, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
No. 08-17735
D.C. No. 1:05-cv-01430-OWW
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of California
Oliver W. Wanger, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 21, 2011**
Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner John Hoskings appeals from the district court’s
order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28
U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.
FILED
NOV 28 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

08-17735 2
Hoskings contends that the Governor’s 2004 decision reversing the Board of
Prison Terms’s decision finding him suitable for parole is not supported by some
evidence. The record reflects that Hoskings received all process that was due. See
Swarthout v. Cooke, 131 S. Ct. 859, 862-63 (2011) (per curiam).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --