Sekove V. Sadria, a.k.a. Jacobo Vodo Sadria v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SEKOVE V. SADRIA, a.k.a. Jacobo Vodo
Sadria,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 10-72529
Agency No. A099-910-947
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted October 25, 2011**
Before: TROTT, GOULD, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Sekove V. Sadria, a native and citizen of Fiji, petitions pro se for review of
the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s removal order. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C.
§ 1252. We dismiss the petition for review.
FILED
OCT 31 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

10-72529 2
We lack jurisdiction to consider Sadria’s contention that his conviction for
possession of a controlled substance qualified for treatment under the Federal First
Offender Act, see generally Ramirez-Altamirano v. Holder, 563 F.3d 800, 806-08
(9th Cir. 2009), because it was not exhausted before the agency. See Barron v.
Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2004).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --