Nelson Ulises Villalata- Berrera v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NELSON ULISES VILLALATA-
BERRERA,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 09-72651
Agency No. A041-132-053
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted October 25, 2011**
Before: TROTT, GOULD, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Nelson Ulises Villalata-Berrera, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions
pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal
from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.
FILED
OCT 31 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

09-72651 2
§ 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Khan v. Holder, 584 F.3d 773, 776
(9th Cir. 2009), and we deny the petition for review.
The agency did not err in finding Villalata-Berrera removable under
8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii), as an alien convicted of an aggravated felony drug
trafficking crime under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(B). His state conviction for
conspiracy to possess cocaine for sale has an equivalent federal felony, see
21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846; Rendon v. Mukasey, 520 F.3d 967, 974 (9th Cir.
2008) (“[A] state drug crime is an aggravated felony if it would be punishable as a
felony under the federal drug laws.”), and the judicially noticeable conviction
documents in the record reveal that the controlled substance at issue was cocaine,
see Valencia v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 1046, 1054 (9th Cir. 2006) (court may consider
transcript from the plea proceedings under the modified categorical approach).
In light of his aggravated felony conviction, the agency did not err in
concluding that Villalata-Berrera was ineligible for cancellation of removal. See
8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a)(3).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --