Luis Castillejo v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LUIS CASTILLEJO,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 10-71082
Agency No. A088-028-605
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted September 27, 2010**
Before: SILVERMAN, W. FLETCHER, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
Luis Castillejo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the
Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration
judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. We have
jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Castillo-
FILED
OCT 06 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

10-71082 2
Cruz v. Holder, 581 F.3d 1154, 1158-59 (9th Cir. 2009), and we deny the petition
for review.
The agency properly denied Castillejo’s application for cancellation of
removal on the ground that his conviction under Arizona Revised Statutes § 28-
1383(A)(1) is a crime involving moral turpitude rendering him inadmissible under
8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2) and therefore ineligible for cancellation relief under 8 U.S.C.
§ 1229b(b)(1). See Marmolejos-Campos v. Holder, 558 F.3d 903, 917 (9th Cir.
2009) (en banc).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --