In re: MELODY L. LARK v. Board of Trustees of the California State University Offfice of the General Counsel

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
In re: MELODY L. LARK,
Debtor.
MELODY L. LARK,
Appellant,
v.
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY
OFFFICE OF THE GENERAL
COUNSEL,
Appellee.
No. 10-60020
BAP No. 09-1239
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the Ninth Circuit
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel
Montali, Pappas, and Markell, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding
Submitted September 27, 2011**
Before: SILVERMAN, W. FLETCHER, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
FILED
OCT 06 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

10-60020 2
Melody L. Lark appeals pro se from the decision of the Bankruptcy
Appellate Panel affirming the bankruptcy court’s determination of the non-
dischargeability of Lark’s student loans under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(8). We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo, Rifino v. United States
(In re Rifino), 245 F.3d 1083, 1087 (9th Cir. 2001), and we dismiss.
We cannot review Lark’s challenge to the bankruptcy court’s oral
determination of the non-dischargeability of her student loans because Lark failed
to include the relevant transcripts in the record on appeal as required by Fed. R.
App. P. 10(b)(2). See Syncom Capital Corp. v. Wade, 924 F.2d 167, 169-70 (9th
Cir. 1991) (per curiam) (dismissing appeal for appellant’s failure to provide a
transcript).
DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --