Kenneth A. Sierra v. GRANNIS, Chief Inmate Appeals;

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KENNETH A. SIERRA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GRANNIS, Chief Inmate Appeals; et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 09-15234
D.C. No. 1:08-cv-00887-RTB-
CAB
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of California
Roger T. Benitez, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 27, 2011 **
Before: HAWKINS, SILVERMAN and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Kenneth Sierra appeals pro se from the district
court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action on the grounds that Sierra's
FILED
SEP 29 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

complaint was nearly incomprehensible. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
The district court did not err in dismissing Sierra’s action. We agree that the
complaint lacks an arguable basis in either law or fact. See 28 U.S.C.
§§1915(e)(2)(B), 1915A.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --