The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-15668•Jerry A. Burton v. ADAMS, Warden
10-15668Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFeb 23, 2011
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
This case was assigned, by the consent of the parties, to a Magistrate**
Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1).
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision***
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JERRY A. BURTON,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
ADAMS, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
No. 10-15668
D.C. No. 1:09-cv-00354-JLT
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of California
Jennifer L. Thurston, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**
Submitted February 15, 2011***
Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Jerry A. Burton appeals pro se from the district
court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction
FILED
FEB 23 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS
-- 1 of 2 --
We certify for appeal, on our own motion, the issue of whether Burton’s1
habeas petition (1) was exhausted and (2) raised a federally cognizable claim for
which habeas relief may be granted.
10-15668 2
under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.1
Burton contends that the prison disciplinary decision validating him as a
gang member and subsequently placing him in the Segregated Housing Unit (SHU)
and precluding him from earning credits pursuant to California Penal Code § 2933
violated his constitutional rights. The district court properly dismissed Burton’s
petition for lack of jurisdiction. Even if Burton exhausted his state judicial
remedies, his petition fails to raise a federally cognizable claim for which habeas
relief may be granted. See Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 489 (1973); see
also Ramirez v. Galaza, 334 F.3d 850, 859 (9th Cir. 2003) (“[H]abeas jurisdiction
is absent, and a § 1983 action proper, where a successful challenge to a prison
condition will not necessarily shorten the prisoner’s sentence.”).
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.