The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-15327•Ron Mosley v. S. Oroski
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RON MOSLEY,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
S. OROSKI,
Respondent - Appellee.
No. 08-15327
D.C. No. CV-05-04260-TEH
Northern District of California,
San Francisco
ORDER
RON MOSLEY,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
S. OROSKI,
Respondent - Appellee.
No. 08-15389
D.C. No. CV-05-04260-TEH
Northern District of California,
San Francisco
Before: ALARCÓN and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Swarthout v. Cooke, No. 10-333,
2011 WL 197627 (Jan. 24, 2011) (per curiam), the disposition filed on November
24, 2010 is withdrawn. Further proceedings are stayed pending final resolution of
Cooke v. Solis, 606 F.3d 1206 (9th Cir. 2010), and Clay v. Kane, 384 Fed. App’x
FILED
JAN 31 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
-- 1 of 2 --
544 (9th Cir. 2010), in this court. The parties are requested to file a notice
memorandum with the Clerk of this court as soon as decisions have been rendered
in these cases.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.