Jorge Rodriguez-Sanchez, a.k.a. Jorge Rodriguez v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JORGE RODRIGUEZ-SANCHEZ, a.k.a.
Jorge Rodriguez,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-74344
Agency No. A037-443-391
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted January 10, 2011**
Before: BEEZER, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Jorge Rodriguez-Sanchez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal.
We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law,
FILED
JAN 25 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

08-74344 2
Cazarez-Gutierrez v. Ashcroft, 382 F.3d 905, 909 (9th Cir. 2004), and we deny the
petition for review.
Rodriguez-Sanchez’s contention that a conviction under Cal. Penal Code
§ 496d(a) is not categorically an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C.
§ 1101(a)(43)(G) is foreclosed by Alvarez-Reynaga v. Holder, 596 F.3d 534, 536-
37 (9th Cir. 2010).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --