Nathalie Tatyana Beck v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NATHALIE TATYANA BECK,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-73447
Agency No. A094-893-732
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted January 14, 2011**
San Francisco, California
Before: HUG, SCHROEDER, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Nathalie Tatyana Beck, a native and citizen of Norway, petitions for review
of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision finding her removable for failure to
maintain or comply with the conditions of her F-1 nonimmigrant student status.
FILED
JAN 25 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2
This court reviews the agency’s legal determinations de novo, and factual
findings for substantial evidence. Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1056 (9th
Cir. 2009).
Petitioner’s F-1 nonimmigrant student status was terminated by her school
because she had failed to make up several incomplete classes from the Fall
semester of 2004. Petitioner’s failure to complete required course work in a
satisfactory and timely manner constitutes substantial evidence supporting a
finding by clear and convincing evidence that she failed to pursue a full course of
study as required by 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(f)(5)(i).
PETITION DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --