United States of America v. Randy James Jangula

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RANDY JAMES JANGULA,
Defendant - Appellant.
Nos. 10-30044 & 10-30045
D.C. Nos. 4:02-cr-00048-SEH
4:03-cr-00038-SEH
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Montana
Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 14, 2010**
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
In these consolidated cases, Randy James Jangula appeals from the 24-
month sentence imposed following the revocation of his supervised release. We
have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
FILED
JAN 04 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

10-30044 & 10-30045 2
Jangula contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. In light of
the totality of the circumstances, the district court’s sentence is substantively
reasonable. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993 (9th Cir. 2008) (en
banc). Moreover, the district court did not procedurally err. See id.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --