United States of America v. Bahram Tabatabai, a.k.a BEN TABATABAI, REZA TABATABAI and ALI TABATABAI

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
BAHRAM TABATABAI, a.k.a BEN
TABATABAI, REZA TABATABAI and
ALI TABATABAI,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 07-50385
D.C. No. CR-99-00225-CAS
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Christina A. Snyder, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 14, 2010**
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Bahram Tabatabai appeals from the district court’s order denying his
petition for writ of coram nobis. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967), Tabatabai’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief,
FILED
DEC 27 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

07-50385 2
along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the
appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se
supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
We deny Tabatabai’s pro se motion for stay of proceedings pending release
from custody.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s
judgment is AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --