Oscar Gonzalez-Lopez v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
OSCAR GONZALEZ-LOPEZ,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 07-75123
Agency No. A077-985-991
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted November 16, 2010**
Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Oscar Gonzalez-Lopez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review
of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal.
We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of
FILED
NOV 30 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

07-75123 2
law, Mielewczyk v. Holder, 575 F.3d 992, 994 (9th Cir. 2009), and we deny the
petition for review.
The agency properly concluded that Gonzalez-Lopez is statutorily ineligible
for cancellation of removal because his conviction for violation of California Penal
Code § 273.5 is categorically a crime of domestic violence under 8 U.S.C.
§ 1227(a)(2)(E)(i). See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(C); Banuelos-Ayon v. Holder, 611
F.3d 1080, 1083 (9th Cir. 2010); see also 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(3)(B) (listing
permissible documents for proof of conviction).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --