Gregorio Vasquez Tello; Elvia Lopez Vasquez; v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

08-70424Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNov 22, 2010

Full text

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GREGORIO VASQUEZ TELLO; ELVIA
LOPEZ VASQUEZ; et al.,
Petitioners,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-70424
Agency Nos. A075-647-604
A075-647-605
A075-647-606
A075-651-208
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted November 16, 2010**
Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Gregorio Vasquez Tello and Elvia Lopez Vasquez, and their family, natives
and citizens of Guatemala, petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’
(“BIA”) order reversing an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision granting
withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review
FILED
NOV 22 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

08-70424 2
for substantial evidence, Gonzalez-Hernandez v. Ashcroft, 336 F.3d 995, 998 (9th
Cir. 2003), and we deny the petition for review.
The BIA reversed the IJ’s grant of relief after finding the evidence was
sufficient to rebut the presumption that Vasquez Tello’s life or freedom would be
threatened in the future. Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s conclusion. See
id. at 998-1001. Accordingly, we deny the petition as to petitioners’ withholding
of removal claim.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.