The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-73718•Fortino Cholula-Rios, a.k.a. Fortinio Rios Cholula, a.k.a. Leonardo Cholula, a.k.a.… v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
09-73718Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNov 19, 2010
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FORTINO CHOLULA-RIOS, a.k.a.
Fortinio Rios Cholula, a.k.a. Leonardo
Cholula, a.k.a. Leopold Fortino Cholula,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 09-73718
Agency No. A092-903-609
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted November 16, 2010**
Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Fortino Cholula-Rios, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order. We dismiss the petition for review.
FILED
NOV 19 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS
-- 1 of 2 --
09-73718 2
We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary denial of Cholula-
Rios’s cancellation of removal application. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i);
Bermudez v. Holder, 586 F.3d 1167, 1169 (9th Cir. 2009) (per curiam). Cholula-
Rios’s challenge to the IJ’s weighing of the evidence is not a legal argument that
confers jurisdiction.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.