Sarkis Agop Dersarkissian v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The Honorable John A. Jarvey, United States District Judge for the**
Southern District of Iowa, sitting by designation.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SARKIS AGOP DERSARKISSIAN,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 06-72417
Agency Nos. A072-867-239
A077-323-827
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Argued and Submitted November 4, 2010
Pasadena, California
Before: SCHROEDER and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges, and JARVEY, District
Judge.**
Sarkis Agop Dersarkissian, a native and citizen of Lebanon, petitions for
review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision adopting and
affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his applications for
FILED
NOV 19 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 3 --

2
asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against
Torture (“CAT”).
The government raises a threshold contention that we lack jurisdiction to
review the IJ’s denial of asylum because the application was untimely. 8 U.S.C. §
1158(a)(3). Dersarkissian filed his asylum application more than six years after he
entered the United States. Even assuming we have jurisdiction to review the IJ’s
denial of the asylum application, however, relief on that claim is barred by the IJ’s
findings of permanent resettlement in Mali. 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(2)(A)(vi).
Petitioner lived in Mali for nine years and had a visa to travel from the Mali
government. He also presented his passport to the Mali officials when he traveled
outside of Mali. See Cheo v. INS, 162 F.3d 1227, 1229 (9th Cir. 1998) (finding
three years of peaceful residence in Malaysia sufficient to establish a rebuttable
presumption that Malaysia allowed petitioners to stay indefinitely). Petitioner’s
case is distinguishable from Ali v. Ashcroft, 394 F.3d 780, 790 (9th Cir. 2005),
where we found no presumption that Ali was permanently resettled in Ethiopia
because Ali’s credible testimony indicated she was living there illegally. The IJ
here, in contrast, reasonably found Petitioner not credible when he claimed no
longer to have permission to live in Mali after 1998, given the fact that his Mali
visa allowed him to stay until December 2000. Given that Petitioner presented no

-- 2 of 3 --

3
other evidence to rebut the presumption of firm resettlement, the IJ’s finding that
Petitioner firmly resettled in Mali is supported by substantial evidence.
The denial of withholding of removal and protection under CAT based on an
adverse credibility finding is supported by the record. The IJ identified several
reasons to find petitioner not credible. Petitioner claimed to be a fighter in the
Kataeb party from 1975 until 1999, yet Petitioner resided in Mali from 1988 until
1997 and lived in the United States in 1998. The facts that he returned to Lebanon
two or three times after arriving in Mali and his wife and children stayed back in
Lebanon indicate that he did not fear persecution. The IJ’s conclusion that the
doctor’s letter, written while removal proceedings were pending, was unreliable is
reasonable given the fact that it was prepared five years after the alleged events and
the lack of underlying contemporaneous documents.
The petition for review is DENIED.

-- 3 of 3 --