United States of America v. Sharrod Bolton, a.k.a. Sharrod Bolten

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
SHARROD BOLTON, a.k.a. Sharrod
Bolten,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 09-50548
D.C. No. 2:07-cr-00298-PA
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 19, 2010**
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Sharrod Bolton appeals from his 21-month sentence imposed upon
revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291,
and we affirm.
FILED
OCT 29 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

09-50548 2
Bolton contends that the district court did not provide an adequate
statements of reasons for the sentence in excess of the policy statement range. To
the contrary, the district court explicitly noted that Bolton blatantly breached the
court’s trust and that he poses a significant risk to the community. Thus, the
district court did not procedurally err. See United States v. Musa, 299 F.3d 1096,
1101-03 (9th Cir. 2000).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --