Roxanna Judith Guerra v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ROXANNA JUDITH GUERRA,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-72667
Agency No. A028-947-785
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted September 13, 2010**
Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Roxanna Judith Guerra, a native and citizen of Peru, petitions for review of
the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to
reconsider. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of
FILED
OCT 13 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

08-72667 2
discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider, Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889,
894 (9th Cir. 2003), and we deny the petition for review.
The BIA was within its discretion in denying Guerra’s motion to reconsider
because the motion failed to identify any error of fact or law in the BIA’s prior
decision denying Guerra’s motion to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1);
Socop-Gonzalez v. INS, 272 F.3d 1176, 1180 n.2 (9th Cir. 2001) (en banc).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --